While watching the Disney Tree video I was trying to make connections to how it relates to our future WP3, but for the most part, I kept viewing the “message” the video had to be more closely related to WP2. It reminded me more of WP2 because when the artists were painting most of them picked a “field” in which they were painting. For example, the one artist was painting the tree with the eye of an architect while another artist painted as a biologist. It was kind of like the activity where we viewed material through a particular lens. Looking at something with one perspective will show you details you would not have noticed while looking with a different perspective. I still don’t really see how our WP3 correlates with the activities we did on Wednesday. I know our material is supposed to build on top of each other which could be why I can’t make a clear distinction as to how this activity relates to WP3.
In our blogs, it was interesting to see who our favorite artists were. It is kind of like a way of seeing what that person's “field” is. The class member’s preference, for the most part, matched the artist’s preferences which related to the way in which the artist saw the tree.
*** I JUST HAD AN EPHINANY***
I understand the reasoning behind the activity we did Wednesday. We were identifying the moves that are important for that genre because those moves are the ones we need to include when we “swap” genres. For example, the moves about introducing the paint brush/ tool that is used should be included because that was something that was common amongst the videos we watched. We need to find the moves that are common and translate them differently into the new genre that we chose.
No comments:
Post a Comment