Looking at the research papers from the generator I found that some of the conventions of a research paper had their own conventions within them. For example, the convention of an abstract within a research had its own convention. Abstracts appear to be short and contain a brief explanation of the experiment and its purpose. Research paper then has a Table of Content; within that Table of Content there is an Introduction, Related Works, Architecture, Implementation, Results, Conclusion, and References. The introduction has conventions of being medium sized. It also is where one will find the hypothesis that set up the experiment. Results also have conventions within them such as, containing graphs and charts, as well as an explanation of the results in relation to the hypothesis. The conclusion seems to be relatively short and is very similar to the Abstract. Conventions of the References would be that it is very standard and orderly and follows guidelines for a particular style to cite other’s work.
Comic conventions seemed like they would be the easiest because everyone would be able to point to the comic if asked if it were presented in a line up style interrogation. It was actually a lot harder trying to identify what makes a comic a comic. Some of the conventions I found were illustrations/cartoons, dialogue is short, to distinguish who is speaking there is a bubble around that characters words, comics are light hearted and humorous, more than one character, scenes are separated by boxes. The particular comic generator we viewed was purely for entertainment, but some comics can be political. Some comics could even be seen as an entertaining new sources if they were written with informative intentions.
Memes’ conventions were also difficult to pin point because they are so simple. Some conventions of memes include large white font, usually at the top and/or bottom of the image. The images that are being written on come from screenshots of videos, movies, and TV shows. The images’ action or facial expression of character within the image relates, to some extent, to the message/joke of the text. Memes are funny; it is rare to see one with a serious message. Or at least the message is perceived as less serious if presented as a meme. Memes also tend to make fun of someone/something. The meme could be making fun of the person that the meme is of, the viewer, or some other person that is mentioned in the text.
Sticking with the same concept as my PB1A I looked up “Romance Novel Plot generator”. I wanted to see if the list of conventions followed the same blueprint as the generators. Many of my conventions did fit with those of the generator. One of the conventions for the plot of a romance novel was the MULTIPLE use of adjectives. Every time I generated a new plot there was na introduction of how the protagonist met their lover, then a problem is created by the antagonist (often in love with the same person the protagonist), then finally the solution where the protagonist succeeds and wins over their lover. The conflict of someone coming between the lovers is also a convention within itself.
To understand genre is to understand patterns as well as an understanding how the patterns are use. These patterns are then used to classify and create a particular type of writing into a category. Genre can be better understood with the used of genre generating websites because the websites show the patterns within each genre. The websites developed a structure that mimicked the basic collection of conventions within the particular genre. By deciphering which components of a genre are reused over and over again within the same genre one finds the patterns which are the conventions. It is helpful to see what conventions are used repeatedly in the generators because it gives one insight as to what makes up that genre as well as hinting at why that convention is important for that genre. For example, the convention of being funny is found in both memes and comics, but why they are both funny can be inferred from other conventions within their genre. Memes can be funny because of their convention of making fun of someone/something where as comics can be funny because of their convention of having illustrations/cartoons.
I thought you did a really great job describing the conventions of a research paper and how even some of those conventions have their own conventions within them. I also thought it was interesting how you said that coming up with specific conventions of the comic strip genre was harder than you were expecting, and I liked reading your perspective on this. I also liked the continuity of how you kept with the same genre as in your PB1A and looked up a romance novel generator. It was interesting to learn even more about the genre and how the conventions you had thought of before related to the ones in the generator. Great job!
ReplyDeleteSutherland,
ReplyDeleteHow to be Single! Nice! I’ve read something similar before for guys!
You mentioned some of the common surface-level features of syllabi: “woman/women with a broken heart(s), cheating men, one woman with the perfect relationship, married couples, exclusively dating couples, lack-luster dates vs. phenomenal dates, point of view is from a woman, comparing the female narrator's life with that of other women, woman pining over a particular guy, man makes incredible gesture to win over the woman that he is in love with, and of course the detailed sexual experiences.” I’d call these “plot conventions”, and they’re all important because they shape the (more) concrete textual conventions.
One area I want to point out where I’d like you to reconsider is when you say that “The style of a romance novel could be considered one of its conventions.” Remember: conventions are specific aspects—like ingredients in a recipe. Stylistic conventions are like those ingredients. All meals—and all genres—have ingredients/styles, so you want to pinpoint what kind/kinds of style you see in the text. The more you can tie down your analysis of genres+conventions to key words/phrases, the stronger your textual analysis will become.
Onto your PB1B: I’d like you to get into more detail on pinpointing the conventions of the Pandyland comic. What was being said? What kinds of patterns did you detect in the characters’ visual actions? How did the content of THIS comic align with your prior experiences with comics? I’d also like you to look for more patterns in your descriptions/analysis of memes-as-genres—the more detail you can provide, the better.
The romance novel generator sounds cool, but you didn’t provide much information on it. What’s it generate? What are the patterns? (And what’s the website?! I’d like to give it a whirl.)
In Writing 2, we’re trying to train you to become super-observant so that you can get down to the nittiest of details and adhere (if that’s what you want to do) to the audience’s expectations. It looks like you’re on your way.
Z
Sutherland,
ReplyDeleteHow to be Single! Nice! I’ve read something similar before for guys!
You mentioned some of the common surface-level features of syllabi: “woman/women with a broken heart(s), cheating men, one woman with the perfect relationship, married couples, exclusively dating couples, lack-luster dates vs. phenomenal dates, point of view is from a woman, comparing the female narrator's life with that of other women, woman pining over a particular guy, man makes incredible gesture to win over the woman that he is in love with, and of course the detailed sexual experiences.” I’d call these “plot conventions”, and they’re all important because they shape the (more) concrete textual conventions.
One area I want to point out where I’d like you to reconsider is when you say that “The style of a romance novel could be considered one of its conventions.” Remember: conventions are specific aspects—like ingredients in a recipe. Stylistic conventions are like those ingredients. All meals—and all genres—have ingredients/styles, so you want to pinpoint what kind/kinds of style you see in the text. The more you can tie down your analysis of genres+conventions to key words/phrases, the stronger your textual analysis will become.
Onto your PB1B: I’d like you to get into more detail on pinpointing the conventions of the Pandyland comic. What was being said? What kinds of patterns did you detect in the characters’ visual actions? How did the content of THIS comic align with your prior experiences with comics? I’d also like you to look for more patterns in your descriptions/analysis of memes-as-genres—the more detail you can provide, the better.
The romance novel generator sounds cool, but you didn’t provide much information on it. What’s it generate? What are the patterns? (And what’s the website?! I’d like to give it a whirl.)
In Writing 2, we’re trying to train you to become super-observant so that you can get down to the nittiest of details and adhere (if that’s what you want to do) to the audience’s expectations. It looks like you’re on your way.
Z